Search results

Because apparently the greatest taboo in medicine is simply saying: 'We don't know.'

This.

The unspoken but implied message is “haul your head out of your arse.” It's not always unspoken and implied.

low doses of naltrexone Surely LDN will work this time? :rolleyes:

Yeah, you gotta be pretty dumb to try scamming with this disease. No easy roads here. Indeed, some of the hardest there is.

Maybe not totally uncharted. No mention at all of ME/CFS, nor MUS/PPS, etc. This is interesting: This is good news, if true: As to this: Nice plan. Good luck.

Hence the endlessly swirling stream of jargon.

DARVO

:D

I still find it difficult to comprehend the sheer scale of the opportunity costs from decades of, um, neglected or misdirected research.

The Big Lie is a thing, and it works, unfortunately.

And it was a Norwegian Blue.

Gotta admire their sheer chutzpah. They will smear anybody. Which is a very long list of enemies.

Stopped there.

It's not a lie if you believe it's true. :speechless:

And cherry picking the interpretation of the literature they do cite.

I certainly don't think it is going to be plain sailing. Nothing about the politics of ME is. Quite the contrary, short of a major breakthrough in the biomedical side, this is potentially the biggest threat to our opponents, so I have no doubt they will move heaven and earth to prevent an...

Or one can relate to standard criteria for mitigation measures. We did the latter. Which is the whole problem. Standards in this kind of research are in the sewer.

This. Including the critical issue of alleged 'harassment and threats' claim. Rip the covers off it and see what is really behind it. I think they go hand-in-hand.

This will always be their fallback position: It only works if the patient wants to get better. The big plus of this position being, of course, that it is completely unfalsifiable. It is impossible for a patient to prove they do want to get better and are trying hard enough.