Search results

Exactly. Which is why those benefiting from them not being retracted are fighting so ferociously to stop them being retracted. Reputations, career, empires, and egos are going to be left shredded in the dust of history when all this is over.

Good piece from DwME. Thanks. :thumbup: It will take lawsuits, or at least serious threats thereof.

We did try to warn the world this was coming. We are only at the end of the beginning of the Covid disaster. It is still globally active, virulent, and mutating merrily away. Just had a prominent Australian epidemiologist say today that we can expect another major wave of it soon here. Just...

Computational models have great potential to revolutionise psychiatry research and clinical practice. Maybe. new concepts in mental health. www.thelancet.com/series/the-digital-mind Hmm.

This.

Keep records of all this, good people. Both on your own computer, and on sites like archive.org and archive.is. Make sure the guilty can never claim they didn't say it.

Apparently the source is this book: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Diary I don't have a copy, so can't confirm. But it seems to be widely available to buy online.

not explained by identified structural damage to the brain Because, apparently, a) they have ruled out all plausible forms of structural damage to the brain, and b) these symptoms can only be caused by structural damage to the brain. Yeah, where's the bottom couple of rows in Maslow's pyramid...

Good Hope Therapy by marketing label.

The only tricky bit in making data available is ensuring it is adequately anonymised (where required, e.g. clinical trials). The rest, as @rvallee points out, is a trivial exercise in the modern online world. I am so tired of the excuses for not making data publicly available for all to access...

High Intensity Yeah, that is just what ME patients need. :facepalm:

empowering One of those words that is a big red warning flag about the woo to follow.

Good idea to keep screenshots of them for the record, and/or save a copy of the whole article (with comments) to archive.org, or archive.is (where it is harder to get articles removed from than the .org site). In part, I would suggest, because they know what is coming about how their colleagues...

Not in principle. The devil is in the details.

Had two surgical procedures with sedation/general anesthetic, no IV pain killers. No problems with them.

Better off just getting a nice pet. ...which equates with having no physiological cause.

'Many people are saying...'

Is he basing that on retrospective or prospective studies?

Delphi consensus isn't exactly proving useful. IMHO.

They also do it in conflating GET with pacing.