Search results

Yeah, that was never part of the mission statement. And took 8 years to do it. :grumpy:

In this traditional narrative literature review, Off to a bad start. (I am not a fan of narrative reviews at the best of times, traditional or otherwise. They are mostly just pseudo-scientific manifestos promoting the authors' ideological prejudices, in my humble opinion.) (Also, FBM is...

Should have had a control group that just gave the patients the money that would have been handed to the arts practitioners.

Far as I am concerned, their reactions simply prove that she is correct.

That is a straight up admission that the trial failed, and the FND club are hardcore anti-science psycho-ideologues. This.

Poverty is the greatest cause of poor health and premature death. Excusing society from dealing with it, and instead blaming the victims, is just sickening cruelty.

Conclusion Family healthcare use, especially within the general practice, may play a role in the transgenerational transmission of FSS. Early-stage FSS identification and care might be improved through training aimed at GPs. Future research may identify vulnerable families at whom parent-focused...

The Unfalsifiability Scam strikes again.

I have long thought that the mechanics of the ECM need some serious attention.

Within the first day of infection you have a metabolic profile which predicts the outcome, and that can be whether you recover, whether you get long COVID or whether you're going to die. This could be interesting. Predictive power at this level is good.

Thank you, Prof. :thumbsup:

I have been giving myself No. 2 buzz cuts for 20 years. Saves a lot of money and hair care.

Point taken. But poorly run observational studies is different from observational studies not being of any intrinsic value. I agree with this.

I think LC patients are expecting too much too quickly. I mean, they should be demanding good science on this, and lots of it. But effective clinically applicable results ain't gonna happen overnight.

They hate and fear us because our mere existence exposes their ignorance and incompetence, their technical and ethical bankruptcy, and the consequences of that for patients. Then we delusional peasant scum add insult to injury by proactively, and accurately, pointing all that out out to the...

A range of conditions including Guillain-Barré syndrome, @Snow Leopard

Not sure this is an important criticism. Half the studies being observational doesn't seem inappropriate for the initial assessment of an emerging problem. Or worse.

This.

Ultimately our fate is going to be decided by bean counters.

I am very firmly of the view that it is deliberate. They know what they are doing. It is entirely arse covering for their very serious sins during the 20 year reign of the current editor in chief, Horton, and will not change while he remains in the position.