That's right. There is no accountability that I can tell. Long covid patients are also not being protected from anything people want to do to them.
Edit: a proportion of them (with PEM, 6 months+) are also not being told that they likely have ME/CFS and believe it's a different condition so...
Am I given to understand that as it's a "living guideline" of some kind and being done in a different way to other guidelines, it will never be "published"?
I am also in isolation although I am now too sick to go out after getting covid last year. I am not yet vaccinated for various reasons including that I feel safer at home than going anywhere at the moment*. It also wouldn't change what I am able to do day-to-day - as you say, I'd still remain in...
I just put out another tweet about the change.org petition and emailed my family to sign. I don't know if the petition will achieve anything, but it seems better than nothing.
I don't know about the Myhill petition. The 2007 guidelines should be withdrawn but she is the wrong messenger.
Post copied from Petition: #MEAction: Publish the NICE ME/CFS Guideline Now
I just put out another tweet about the change.org petition and emailed my family to sign. I don't know if the petition will achieve anything, but it seems better than nothing.
I don't know about the Myhill petition...
I am not saying it's this, but something similar happened to me when I got covid although I didn't realize it at the time until I got more symptoms. My heels (and skin on my hands) cracked open and I thought it may be something to do with neuropathy and ignored it. I tried to clear the dry skin...
I would have more sympathy with this if not for the blatant conflicts of interests involved. It's fairly obvious people are going to defend their own research and activities.
FWIW I didn't make any (at approx 8 weeks; I got an antibody test as soon as available) but I was lucky in that my doctor soon realized that didn't mean I hadn't had covid. Unfortunately he's had to retire now and there are still somehow people who do not understand that we did not have PCR...
On the substance and content of the "debate" I agree, but I think the framing device of a "debate" is being used in bad faith by e.g. the BMJ and in a similar rhetorical style to the framing of climate change as a "debate". It is simply a method of creating room to manoeuvre and an unclarity...
I think this is psychological abuse. I understand why we don't talk about abuse more as people think it's over the top etc and so we can't talk about it, but it's abuse nonetheless.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.