Although we don't know if fMRI is measuring a real effect (correct?)--- if it is then these folks would need to demonstrate that CBT and GET --- undo that problem. So if fMRI is validated then I reckon that would wreck a lot of CBT and GET careers!
@Adam pwme you have some contacts in the Lyme & Log covid communities i.e. via Twitter. Since Nath [NIH] reckons ME/CFS, Lyme & Log covid are basically the same then there may be an opportunity to join forces to lobby for a "good fMRI study" & "serious muscle study like that of Wust". The NIH...
Decided I'd ask NIH whether they'd follow through with this paper i.e. in the (NIH) ME/CFS Research Roadmap Priorities?
Thanks for the insight & suggestions @JonathanEdwards
I recall that Nath is on record as saying re Lyme, ME/CFS & long covid - if you solve one then you solve them all. So this is the "great unifying theory" -- post infection your brain tells you that you can't do stuff & in some cases that persists i.e. a biological abnormality.
So is this...
Interesting ---comorbidities --- cause or consequence or unrelated? If unrelated then presumably those with that [co-occurring] disease have the same incidence of ME/CFS as the rest of the population -- 0.4% or whatever?
I think the problem with PEM is that it's based on a questionnaire ---...
I agree.
Interesting though (for me) that they struggled to find "true ME/CFS" i.e. many (/most?) didn't meet the criteria. I think Jonathan's comment, re this "grey" area being useful, is interesting.
Thank you very much for the insight.
OK my standard post (no need to reply!) would this be expected to have a genetic signature i.e. DecodeME or a rare genetic variant (whole genome sequence) study?
EDIT - "dysregulated cholinesterase" - "Gulf War" syndrome comes to mind!
Further EDIT(!)...
"For the NIH study it was much bigger than the studied cohort." --- NIH study?
EDIT - the Nath (NIH) study?
Thank you very much - I'll need to think about your reply (you're way ahead of me - great!). I think I noticed sleep studies - another option?
@JonathanEdwards @SimonMcGrath grateful if you could highlight research areas which you consider should be funded i.e. to suggest to NIH.
I'm planning on suggesting a rare variant (whole genome study) i.e. looking at families with more than 1 member affected (and at least one severe) plus a...
Oops @TomKindlon -
I replied to Tom Kindlon's Facebook post (highlighting need for research) with this post*.
*"Hi Tom, re research - NIH are looking for suggestions re what ME/CFS research to fund - think they need to be in by the [EDIT - 8th] March (next month).
I intend suggesting a family...
I wasn't suggesting it was - more that I can't really see why people are interested in separating MS from ME - surely it's relatively easy to diagnose MS i.e. measure the level of the (myelin) degradation product in the blood?
I recall that the American Army MS study, i.e. which indicated EBV was usually the cause of MS, used a biomarker - degradation of myelin. So I'm always a bit surprised re discussion of separating MS from ME.
Article on Health Rising - don't know if there's further/new data --- hoping you guys will analyse!
EDIT - OK skimmed the article & here's an extract:
"UK researchers reported they have already replicated the 2019 results and have done so not just with ME/CFS patients and healthy controls but...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.