Search results

Sorry, it works for for me. Can someone else help please?

This might help. https://www.hfme.org/adrenalinesurgetips.htm

here's a new one to me- Hang in there. :-)

LOL Sometimes more recently it looks like that. It is part of a very complex and often misunderstood yearly process. Here is a related article. "Congress has approved a $2 billion raise, to $39.1 billion, for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in a 2019 spending bill"...

That's very good to know. Could you post all of our report language?

and from that article last year: "It is as if the New Yorker or the Economist demanded that journalists write and edit each other’s work for free, and asked the government to foot the bill. Outside observers tend to fall into a sort of stunned disbelief when describing this setup. A 2004...

and from June 2017 a history of this busine$$ https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science "The idea that scientific research should be freely available for anyone to use is a sharp departure, even a threat, to the current system –...

Hopefully someday people who wish to go into the psych professions will be appropriately screened so that the ones who should not be involved in that area will be directed elsewhere.

Putting the rest cure to rest—again Rest has no place in treating chronic fatigue Sharpe and Wessely BMJ 1998 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1112768/

FWIW, I got this banner ad again today above Sharpe's response; but only one time.

I got this ad. The 6th World Conference on Research Integrity (WCRI) to be held on June 2-5, 2019 in Hong Kong. http://www.wcri2019.org/

more reviews: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8792570/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

https://afflictedreviews.com/reviews/