Search results

  1. J

    Ronald W. Davis, PhD's presentation at the IIMEC13

    I'm afraid it's necessary to go one step further than that. Even a proof of a disease existing is still a big step away from having an approved treatment. As long as no approved treatments are available, I think ME/CFS is always going to be a target of biopsychosocial treatment approaches. As...
  2. J

    Metabolic features and regulation of the healing cycle—A new model for chronic disease pathogenesis and treatment, Robert K Naviaux, 2018

    The human body has a huge number of negative feedback loops to deal with any oscillations or setpoint changes. So for example when blood sugar raises following a meal, the insulin concentration starts to rise, and there is actually some oscillation going on around this setpoint, which would be a...
  3. J

    New Scientist: Probiotics are mostly useless and can actually hurt you

    FMT will probably turn out to be the superior method to treat issues with microbiome, which may extend well past diseases of the bowel. It's a shame that perhaps the most promising microbiome therapy is somewhat risky and quite expensive as well, as it seems patients may need periodically new...
  4. J

    New Scientist: Probiotics are mostly useless and can actually hurt you

    It is not surprising to me that commercial probiotic mixes typically fail, as they don't include human-derived strains to begin with. The typical probiotic mix mostly includes lactic acid bacteria, which provide a good shelf-life and are not broken down by stomach acid. But for actually...
  5. J

    Biomedical articles on MEpedia - purposes and pitfalls

    Exactly, this is the dilemma. Nothing has been replicated many times over with ME/CFS. I don't see a problem with referencing to smaller-scale studies as long as the studies were peer reviewed and not fraudulent. A wiki page will anyhow always mostly serve function as a reference to other...
  6. J

    Biomedical articles on MEpedia - purposes and pitfalls

    Isn't that a general issue that applies to regular Wiki pages as well and not specifically to MEpedia? Regular Wiki pages are up to all sorts of discussion, edits, vandalism etc., but usually they end up rather fine.
  7. J

    Everything you always wanted to know about non-cytolytic enterovirus but were too afraid to ask

    This post and several following posts have been moved at @JenB's request from this thread. Regarding the non-cytolytic enterovirus article in specific, the first passage reads: So IMO from reading this passage it should already become clear to the reader that the article discusses the...
  8. J

    Patentscope: Prevention and/or treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome

    Nah we at PR thought it was the salmon peptide supplement due to Victoria Bohne's past involvement with the fish industry, but it turned out to be wrong. The treatment in question is an oxalic acid based drinkable, as described in their patent doc here.
  9. J

    Why has 'persistent enteroviral infection' been dropped as a research strand in ME/CFS? (Jen Brea asking)

    @JenB My bad, I meant to express that enteroviruses are "far from harmless" instead of "everything but harmless". Language / brain fog barrier.
  10. J

    Why has 'persistent enteroviral infection' been dropped as a research strand in ME/CFS? (Jen Brea asking)

    IMO this cannot be stated often enough, not only because of the connection to ME/CFS, but due to other potential diseases it may treat as well. Just like for thread starter, it boggles my mind why the research hasn't progressed more in this area. I used to follow these enterovirus discussions...
Back
Top Bottom