Search results

I'm not sure if that's something NICE would consider relevant. The scope, as published, doesn't really consider categorisation or coding. It's about treatment and diagnosis.

So the voting must help with shortlisting, and then the judges pick the final winners? I can't imagine they'd leave it entirely to popularity.

Oh that's interesting. I assumed there was a panel who decided the final winners. He better get tweeting then?

Oh, this is just how the awards work. I know a few people who've won or been nominated. Think of it as voting to shortlist, rather than voting to win outright. The public can nominate literally anyone, so they balance that out by requiring people to vote for nominees. That way, only people with...

Exactly. This looks like a model for burnout, or even PTSD: prolonged stress + exhaustion = ???

Stephen Fry elevates the poor writing (although they're not terrible; just not brilliant) to real entertainment. Reading the books is a relatively breezy but okay experience; listening to them read is fabulous. I rather think it's the world JKR creates that captures the imagination most...

As most of the researchers are American, you'd expect at least a quarter of the respondents to be non-white: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_ethnicity_in_the_United_States

It is odd that there isn't a straight FM comparison. That would have made more sense.

Independence on this scale, it should be noted, includes the use of aids. It's not true independence.

And 'holistic' to me seems to mean much the same as 'biopsychosocial'.

Get the fuck out.

Interesting. It's a weird mix, I have to say. The journal seems a bit muddled. Critical theory + scientific research doesn't really seem like a good pairing to me. They do different things. The first is a 'what if', academic exercise, whereas the second is a 'this is what we found' situation...

That's really weird. Your daughter, especially, is slap bang in the middle of the second age group cluster.

It's a media journal with some research elements not a science journal, per se, so it's not going to be written with the same standards as a scientific journal. Specifically, the 'constructionist feminist perspective' is a statement of framework for the argument that will follow. For example...

We got Lost in Space. And the new one on Netflix. And the one with Matt Le Blanc.

The website is still under construction, it seems, and the design does lean heavily on that of #MEAction, even including the hashtag.

Yes.

Don't worry, I've already sent a link to the chair.

Have you considered metabolic syndrome? It involves a cluster of symptoms, such as high blood sugar without being diabetic, high cholesterol and an 'apple shape' body or central obesity: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/metabolic-syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20351916

I think that's the case, yes. But I still disagree with their list because it favours acute injuries and downgrades women's pain, which makes me instantly suspicious.