This rebranding of pacing as APT where it was used as a straw man in the PACE trial and would therefore be less effective than the predetermined outcome for CBT (Constant Bullsh*t Treatment) and GET (Gradual Euthanasia Therapy) is indeed strange as the bio psych mob have already discredited...
Could they just box up the raw data that no staff employed at QMUL can read and must be taking up space in a spring cleaning exercise for the university o_O
Cannot find any mention of the confidentiality clause QMUL apply when not allowing anonymised data out, such as is currently used when denying access - http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0040808
Could oxidative stress that triggers hemoglobin production combined with the lower blood volumes (Bell - Streeten) be a biological adaption as the body moves towards using anaerobic energy production.
https://www2.palomar.edu/anthro/adapt/adapt_3.htm
I was not on the ship, neither as passenger or crew. I helped recruit some patients to the study from our clinic, as did many doctors, but that was as far as it went...
Actometers that were specified for use in 2007 PACE trial protocol for patients at baseline but considered an unnecessary encumbrance on recovered participants at the end of the trial.
Dutch FITNET did use ankle bracelet actometers but did not include data from them in the final published...
Total and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and sedentary time at age 11 years were measured by accelerometry over a 7-day period.
Surely not the same accelerometry that children found stigmatizing, so subjective reporting was the only possible recourse that researchers respecting children...
Reminded that the IOM committee also stated their definition was created for diagnostic rather than research cohort recruiting purposes which adds further credence that a stand alone PEM definition is urgently needed.
The medical community have respect from society but for those that know of him Wessely has no such luxury.
https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/2017/10/18/dozens-leading-professionals-just-slammed-theresa-mays-controversial-new-mental-health-guru-letter/
DWP evidence would be wholly inadmissible in any other court
https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2017/november/senior-judge-says-dwp-evidence-tribunals-so-poor-it-would-be-wholly-inadmissible
Says all that needs be said about a rigged system that has been condemned in four UN reports...
CPET has shown the differences between groups is not apparent until the repeat session. HRV by finger sensor lacks the accuracy of chest straps when comparisons have been carried out using elite athletes, something that neither group meet criteria for and that brings up criteria used for...
Retaining treatments as the only ones that have any research evidence (SMILE Trial :( ) could be a dangerous place after Montgomery Vs Lanarkshire Health Board
https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf
Informed Consent requires that any risk of harm that a reasonable...
That will render the severe and very severe as fortunate that they cannot access current treatment protocols from the clinics.
How can abandoned by medical services and left to rot be the preferred option for any guideline.
“First, do no harm” from an ethical standpoint and acknowledging the exercise intolerance (SEID) that the IOM included in it's 2015 report. Removing criteria such as the Oxford criteria as the NIH Statement is unambiguous that the Oxford criteria are flawed and lack reliability, thereby...
Paolo Macchiarini's position and defense of it by the Karolinska Institute would be a case in point where reputations and funding brought in by leading researchers outweigh the truth until a tipping point is reached that makes association with them toxic.
Journals also have difficulty correcting...
Holgate has CMRC on track so merger with BACME will be all part of the big picture no doubt a shame as there were hopes of honest neutrality rather than providing apologies for funding the biopsychosocial model by the MRC.
Will cannabinoids with the THC removed be legal as they are in the UK, though I think large pharmaceutical companies would prefer that any alternative for their products were removed from the market soonest and have the political lobbying budget that generally prevails.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.