Search results

I think the key information we are missing is the placebo response rate. 50% would not typically be a requirement, really a result statistical significant over the placebo response rate should be enough to indicate a positive result. The 30% response rate suggested in the ritux arm is also...

It's bizarre the way the first phase II trial had responders who relapsed shortly afterwards. And then in the second (unblinded) phase II the response duration increased after the maintenance doses. So there was a link between dose and duration of response. Hard to believe it wasn't a genuine...

Not much. There hasn't been anything to get too excited about, although there are promising signs. Hopefully 2018 will provide better research news. The funding is looking better but it will take a bit of time to yield results I think. It seems like things are turning for the better...

My understanding is he never said sexual abuse can be liberating. He said sexual encounters, even if there is a 6 year age gap, could be liberating.

Coyne is really getting hit hard over this on twitter:

Just noticed this on twitter. Looks like a great library of research. http://www.ronnieschuurbiers.nl/scienceforme/ And what a great name Ronnie choose too.:) Ronnie is on twitter : @r_schuurbiers

He spoke at iimec 11 (2016) Here is what @Mark wrote about it

There is a table in one of the previous studies which lists the response of all participants. I think it's Table 1 here It was fairly mixed, But just read the paper there is a lot of info in it.

It's very good, quite a casual chat. It's easy to poke holes and it's not easy to interview - every viewer probably wants something different so I think Ben did a great job of trying to talk about the main items. Personally I would have been interested in more specific details around the...

Presumably there should be a way of targeting the survey towards a particular audience and not everybody on the internet.

I agree with you that Jens tweet was inappropriate, but calm down. We can all disagree without threatening to leave.

Jane Colby is tweeting more positivity.

Really impressed with Solve, these all look like worthy candidates.

Not exactly someting to look forward to though is it ?:rolleyes: Although if @Jonathan Edwards gets to review it, it might be interesting.

Neither do I, its very weird. Why not - I support Good Science ? That would be sufficent.

I don't think it has been nominated. It has been submitted for consideration. Maybe change the thread title - it is misleading.

Do we know if it's true? I am sceptical.

Gary Burgess A journalist, employed as an on-screen and off-screen Content Editor for ITV News in Jersey & columnist He talks about setting up a new website.... Maybe we should reach out to him, save him a bit of bother. We can be happy that our name is at least better than zonked club...

Ok, I hope this is recent news. http://bestpractice.bmj.com/best-practice/monograph/277.html

Ha, I just saw the tweet now, presumed it was new.