Search results

Why should they make up their mind when they can have everything? Just interpret words as needed...as "experts" their interpretation mirrors always reality. No proofs needed.

Huh? Did I miss something? Since when is Mrs Crawley in medical research? Isn't she doing psychology stuff? (Just had a look at her CV - she actually has no psychological background there. Very confusing!)

Thank you, @Jonathan Edwards, a very clear reply that I understood! Just great :) I think I got a wrong impression before. So, can I summarize it as "lab results plus common sense and thinking"? (Which should be straightforward.) But I think sometimes/often there's not an obvious connection...

I am more and more baffled why Miss Crawley is allowed to continue doing "research". It must be political reasons. There are so many flaws in her studies, it's so obviously bad I realize as I keep on getting information. I wonder if this might hold for most of psychology "research", and...

When would you say autoantibodies are a problem? What confuses me a bit: I got the impression here that lab results aren't "central" in the sense that one cannot tell there's a problem by lab results. (Normally people with symptoms test their blood..) How can you diagnose an autoimmune...

Isn't 39% a relatively good quote?

Interesting article. From a scientific view: Why should something change in one's genome/mtRNA or so when a small amount of DNA is injected once? Would the reapeated injection of DNA change the outcome?

The results of bad science or lack of science can always come back to those who are responsible for it, e.g. when suddenly falling sick - which may happen to everyone - and there's no treatment. For example: It is said that the plague was one of the reasons why the church lost their power -...

Thank you, @adreno, I ordered it, too. Will you who ordered tell about your results?

This list is weird. I don't understand it. It's scary. Not being allowed to use "science based"? And what's wrong with "fetus"? Is this now really the return to the middle-ages? @Andy I've just thought this list might be connected to religious motifs - I remember some of my American relatives...

I tested cysthationine and xanturic acid in a 24h urine test (cysthatinione without methionine load test, xanturic acid with tryptophan load test, which I won't repeat because I felt terrible). Another indicator is for me the "intolerance" to B6 intake and low ALP.

Thank you, @alicec!!! I think something like this is meant.

Oh my gosh, absolutely disgusting. So much rubbish...ahhh, the blue cardigan! :rofl:

I think 250mg of Magnesium per day is not so much. Also I agree with @Valentijn and @Wonko concerning magnesium compounds: Not a good development, to reduce the suggested Magnesium intake even more...

Thank you all who organised and participated! I think it was a great event. I have no suggestions for change, I just liked it.

I also wonder...The other thread isn't opened yet.

Thank you, @alicec, very helpful! What about malabsorption of mitochondria in general?

It's somehow a weird case... :bored: a little annoying - but you're right, it's funny at the same time. I really hope it is just played. Although it's known that a certain amount of dumbness is circulating, so everything's possible.

Hi @alicec, do you maybe know if something like a malabsorption of mitochondria exists?

Why aren't psychology experts/psychiatrists thus questioned when in court? Their 'expertise' is looked upon as science although what they say is most often subjective.