Search results

No, they don't. I would contact them and ask, but I'm a member. I don't want future problems. Maybe there's someone else who would be willing to do it.

And here is what a Swiss insurer writes: https://www.css.ch/de/home/privatpersonen/medizinische_beratung/medicine20/gesundheitslexikon/c/chronische_muedigkeit_cfs.html

Thank you @Esther12!

Here is what the TK (a German health insurer) says about treating "CFS":

That was the problem in my case, although I confess the problem was me sending a paper with 2 day CPET. They refused to make these tests. Does anybody know of a possibility in Germany? If it helps with lawsuits, I could really use it.

Thank you, @Esther12! Edit: What is the problem with that study?

I understood that. I was referencing to this study. To me, it seems far fetched to make a correlation between childhood trauma abd a certain DNA's changes without further research. There are hundreds of other possibilities why there are DNA changes.

@Lilpink, I always value your advocates' analyses. Lots of thanks!

Yes, I don't speak Norwegian. There are English subtitles.

Mella said in the video the findings were positive so far.

This is a highly interesting video! He talks about so much different topics: Metabolics findings (Naviaux, pyruvate kinase, high lactate levels, also in the brain), the study where they combined grown muscle cells and blood by ME people, vascular stuff, orthostatic intolerance and many more.

I don't get it. If the methylation differences were small, how can you say that And how can you prove without a doubt that (childhood) trauma are the cause of DNA methylation?

That reminded me of Prof. Stark's statements.

Thank you, @Kalliope!

Thank you, @Valentijn, for your great analysis on this topic! Very helpful.

But the reasons for drop-out in the control and intervention group are most probably different.

I would never accept that a doctor/a GP is allowed to have short lists of my medical issues. Easily misused.

Does this suffice for scientists as proof for low-quality? (I don't mean psychologists; they obviously love their publications and view them as scientific.)

I don't accept any "psychological diagnosis" - I don't believe in its existence - and I don't want to be put under a 'community umbrella' that, in principle, accepts the possibility of ME 'being in the head'. I am totally fine if someone personally has another opinion. I am also fine with most...

Yes, that's how it sounded, given the context.