Search results

It's definitely your right. You, like all other people, have the right to pay with your organs for effective treatment of the symptoms, without addressing the causes of the disease. As long as there are doctors and scientists with this model of the world, hospitals will never be without...

I like your approach. Yes, it seems that the discussion has veered a bit to the side. That's what moderators are for :) Okay, about medical applications. I have never heard of hypnosis being used to treat illnesses unrelated to psychology or psychiatry. That is, I am not aware of any hypnosis...

@Hutan, Prove that your model of the world, with your system of utility proof views, is the only true one. Prove it using the methods of exact science. If you cannot do this, it would be very decent to admit that there are other systems of views that are not fully understood by people at the...

With hypnosis, I decided to delve deeper into the question of this discussion, namely, can hypnosis be classified as scientific? I delved into deep meditative hypnosis, which I downloaded completely free from YouTube. And here's what I think: To say that hypnosis is irrelevant to science is...

You have to prove conspiracy to defraud, otherwise it's just words.

So it does affect people's psyche and health? Great, that's a very good shift in our discussion! As has been said here, hypnotherapists haven't been able to prove the dangers of hypnosis in the last 50 years ;)

Okay, now that you're talking about your student years, I'll say this too. I had a course in analytical chemistry at university. In a lab quiz (not an exam), we had to determine the reagent substance. Each student was given a substance with no name and 1 hour to determine. I did it in 10 minutes...

To me, this means that the research was done by unscrupulous and dishonest people. And it means nothing else. You can't say that another person will do the research and he or she will be dishonest and dishonest too. The number of unscientific arguments begins to grow :)

There is some research on 40 people. And on the basis of that study, they think that hypnosis doesn't work. Does everyone here think it would be very scientific to draw such a big conclusion from such a small study? It looks something like this: find an orchard where only green apples grow, and...

This is just your assumption. You cannot know for sure what is in the hearts of a person, an explorer. All the more so without any examination of this researcher's motives. That doesn't sound very much like a scientific argument. You are beginning to outrun me in your ability to speak without...

You are entitled to be right in your model of the world, which implies a certain methodology. Prove that your model of the world is the only right one ;)

Please tell me, did these studies include all people in a row or only those who can visualize well? I think this is important because hypnosis and meditation will only work well (in my unproven opinion) for those who can visualize well. Why do I think so? Above in this thread I talked about the...

Highlighted is what really matters: comparing hypnotherapy with no intervention. To me, this means that this issue has not been researched enough-just a small group of 40 people. More research is needed!

The Pope, who lived at the time of Copernicus, also thought that Copernicus' research was pseudoscientific. The Pope had a very limited view of the world, he liked to be in the confines of rigid stereotypes. Once upon a time I heard about an experiment in which a mouse was implanted with...

Definitely, I like the falsifiability principle :) By the way, I have read about studies of the electroencephalogram of a meditating person. And it is proven that it is different from the waking person's state. Meditation is very similar to hypnosis, isn't it? After all, hypnosis is a state of...

I like your words :) The only thing is that with man's entry into space, it was definitely seen that the Earth is in space. Before that there were only theoretical justifications and models. I didn't get this from anywhere, these are my words. And I could be wrong, as could everyone here. All...

About the BPS - that's funny :emoji_grinning: About Copernicus, no, I don't agree. To say that they were right is to commit the error of hindsight. That is, we can now say for sure that they were right. But at the time it was only their view, even if they had tests and results. Those tests and...

For example. One reality about cigarette: cigarette is something that adults do, that gives authority to a teenager, that doesn't harm right now, but makes you feel relaxed, smoking is good. The second reality about cigarette: cigarette is a slow killer of a person, it's an addiction, it's very...

In the 15th and 16th centuries, Nicolaus Copernicus and Galileo Galilei also put forward a theory that did not fit the then understanding of science. These theories were not finally proven until the 20th century, when people went into outer space and actually saw a round Earth and its rotation...

If it works for someone who wants to stop smoking, then it works - and that's the proof :) I have great doubt that anything, even hypnosis or clinical medicine, will work for someone who doesn't want to stop smoking. Wouldn't it?