...Monbiot Calls Out the GET/CBT Charlatans and the Fraudulent PACE Trial...
The aim of the study is to produce a "clinical assessment toolkit", one that can be used in clinical care, but also in the evaluation of both...
I think these are the details that we have, PACE trial data
Posts discussing the results and data availability of the PACE trial have been moved to A general thread on the PACE trial!
Not even proof of that. The main PACE trial paper shows that 160 people were in the GET group at baseline, at 24 weeks there were only 150. I...
...to the work of Kindlon, in particular his re-analysis of the PACE trial which showed that treatment effects were overestimated. Kindlon’s work...
Agreed. This paper is mediocre, but it's in the realm of biomedical, not biopsychosocial, research. Let's use it as a starting-off point. "We...
I don't see how using a biomedical study which participants have been promised will move the field of ME research forward and help find biomarkers...
...a distinction between a) the kind of advocacy that followed the PACE trial, where advocates spent years dissecting the paper and then...
Okay but the way that a BPS researcher took over this biomedical trial of ME patients and twisted it to fit a psychological/psychosomatic lens is...
...More broadly, I'd caution people against applying the PACE trial playbook to this study. It made sense to go after the PACE trial hammer and...
...(the people above) is 'done to us'. And the harm data from the PACE trial shows that, when you look at long-term follow-up, and there is yet...
I am reminded of the comments made by a NICE committee member with a link to Bristol in response to my witness statement on trial problems. It was...
Evidence to add to our thread on why GET is bad for people with ME. Perhaps we should be asking Crawley et all to sign our petition on withdrawing...
...isn’t done with fixed increments in clinical practice (i.e. the PACE trial version of GET as described in the guideline) — this trial shows...
And also stop good money being thrown after bad should for example it start to become clear that the objective measures a trial was funded to do...
...might be – based on how authors responded to letters about the Pace trial and similar. Those criticised ignore all the strong points and focus...
Am I correct in thinking that technically @Murph 's point could apply to anyone who chose a hard task despite knowing they might not complete it....
...that are identifiable before a trial even starts! So the PACE trial design, for instance, could have stated up front that being fully unblinded...
To have a very rough overview and a comparison of the sample size Walitt uses to that of other studies, below is some very brief information of...
Separate names with a comma.
