Article critic of a BPS (British Psychology Society) controversial report on psychosis. There are familiar flaws: incomplete definition, wilful ignorance of biological causes, bad questionnaires, "inadequate provision of psychological therapies"... https://www.nationalelfservice.net/mental-health/psychosis/understandingpsychosis/ Edit: why is the Mental Elf unable to do the same for ME?
Because they have a very large and nasty bias which results in unconditional support for anything involving Simon Wessely.
Coyne article on the same topic: At least 3 reasons you don’t have to read Understanding Psychosis and Schizophrenia 2 https://jcoynester.wordpress.com/20...-understanding-psychosis-and-schizophrenia-2/
I see at the end of that article that Coyne has a book to sell. I wonder if it's written in his own inimitable style? Perhaps a subject for a seperate thread.
