1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Identification of actin network proteins, talin-1 and filamin-A, in circulating extracellular vesicles as blood biomarkers...ME/CFS 2019, Eguchi et al

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Sly Saint, Nov 21, 2019.

  1. wigglethemouse

    wigglethemouse Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    954
    This is what the UK Cure ME team had to say about CRP in the discussion section of their paper
    Source : https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6627354/
     
    andypants, MEMarge, JaneL and 10 others like this.
  2. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,674
    Location:
    UK
    To be fair they don't state that it's helpful, they state that it has an 'impact' - which it does, a negative impact.


    Depressing that they keep saying that depression is a symptom isn't it.
     
    sb4, FMMM1, MEMarge and 9 others like this.
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,534
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Very good point Wonko.

    Though they do say this earlier in the paper:
    suggesting they think GET is somewhat effective.
     
    sb4, FMMM1, JaneL and 7 others like this.
  4. alex3619

    alex3619 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,129
    Protein containing EVs correlating with CRP does not necessarily mean that CRP is elevated. Its often not as we know. But if EV is elevated, and it further correlates with CRP so that those who do have high CRP have very high EV, then the correlation is maintained. If this is more likely in more severe patients, as suggested in one comment, then this is even more interesting. For those looking into the biochemistry, what impact might these proteins have from the established science?
     
    alktipping, Marky, Kitty and 3 others like this.
  5. mariovitali

    mariovitali Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    499
    With a bit of googling, supplementary materials :

    [​IMG]



    and


    [​IMG]



    and

    [​IMG]

    and

    [​IMG]
     
    Manganus, Legend, Anna H and 14 others like this.
  6. wastwater

    wastwater Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    347
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
  7. Hoopoe

    Hoopoe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,234
    A question I have is why would there be EVs containing proteins that have to do with the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions, and what does that have do with ME/CFS?

    Reading up on the function of these proteins, one thing that might fit with some of the ME/CFS theories is altered cell deformability.

    Why would the body try to make its cells stiffer? I think that might have to do with defense against pathogens.
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
    Hutan, andypants, FMMM1 and 9 others like this.
  8. butter.

    butter. Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    196
    I am very severe, my CRP and ESR are non existent.
     
    Guest 2176, FMMM1, alktipping and 2 others like this.
  9. Kitty

    Kitty Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,062
    Location:
    UK
    And/or, what are the consequences if a disease process makes them stiffer?
     
    andypants, FMMM1 and merylg like this.
  10. adambeyoncelowe

    adambeyoncelowe Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,731
    The CureME finding jives with this. They say CRP is higher mainly in mild-moderate patients, meaning severe patients would be expected to have lower CRP on average than mild-moderate patients. I'm not sure that makes this a good biomarker, but it's maybe one to watch.
     
    Hutan, andypants, alktipping and 4 others like this.
  11. duncan

    duncan Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,572
    This paper specifies skeletal muscle. Maybe the Australians were on to something with the calcium channelopathy theory. But the tie to EV escapes me. Are EVs remnants or blebs from skeletal muscle cells?
     
    andypants and Kitty like this.
  12. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,534
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Thanks for the supplementary materials @mariovitali. The charts are so much more useful than P values I think.

    To me, the chart doesn't suggest a clear differentiation between healthy controls and PwME for CRP. Even the correlation between CRP and EV numbers looks pretty weak.

    Most people, regardless of cohort, had a CRP value of less that 0.05 mg/dL (0.5 mg/L), with just a small number of outliers (the outliers being both healthy controls and PwME).
    Screen Shot 2019-11-23 at 12.49.39 AM.png
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
  13. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,278
    Location:
    London, UK
    Reading the paper as a whole I am not very impressed. The introduction, discussion and data presentation do not have the ring of people with a deep understanding of the problem. There is no mention of blinding of samples and the way repeated cohorts have been used does not look to have been done in a way to ensure bias is avoided.

    My thought is that extracellular vesicles of this sort are basically cell debris - bits of those cells that have fallen apart. The most likely cells to fall apart and give rise to vesicles in venous blood are neutrophils. I think there may be a sample handling problem that might produce systematic bias. It is also quite possible that the different patterns of activity that occur in PWME have an effect on the number of senescent neutrophils in plasma.

    The number of vesicles certainly does not give a diagnostic test since there is major overlap. Most ME patients fell within a normal range constructed from controls. The data on specific proteins looks limited and I suspect was not repeated on a second test cohort.
     
    Manganus, andypants, Anna H and 16 others like this.
  14. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    13,278
    Location:
    London, UK
    Yes, I cannot see how you can get a meaningful correlation out of that plot.
     
  15. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,263
    do we know the male/ female split in this?
    has the analysis been done separately re male/ females
    given that we know there are differences in metabolism and expression (and the one non heriditary gene found by Chris Ponting was females only) could this be relevant?
     
    andypants, Michelle and alktipping like this.
  16. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,814
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    No, there is no information on that (that I found).
     
    Manganus, alktipping and Amw66 like this.
  17. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    Belgium
    I also thought the study is a bit confusing.

    They start by comparing the number of circulating extracellular vesicles (EV) in several samples of ME/CFS patients compared to healthy controls. That's where they report a clear differentiation with a Area under ROC curve of 0.8.

    But when they looked at ME/CFS patients versus patients with depression or idiopatic chronic fatigue there was no longer a significant difference (perhaps the sample size was too small?). So they go on to focus on the proteins within these vesicles that differ in ME/CFS versus these controls. But there are so many of these proteins its difficult what to make of this. They should probably specifiy the ones they think are abnormal and test these in another, larger sample.
     
    andypants, Anna H, Michelle and 9 others like this.
  18. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,495
    Location:
    Belgium
    I think there are now three groups looking at these extracellular vesicles in ME/CFS.

    A Spanish group published a study about this last year (Castro-Marrero et al.) Their study was preliminary as the sample size was really small; 10 ME/CFS patients and 5 healthy controls. They reported that "the amount of EV-enriched fraction was significantly higher in CFS/ME subjects than in HCs (p = 0.007) and that EVs were significantly smaller in CFS/ME patients (p = 0.014)." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29696075

    Then there's Maureen Hanson's group at Cornell University. They haven't published yet but I think that in her talk at the OMF symposium in September, Hans said that there was no difference in the amount of extracellular vesicles between patients and controls but that the former did have more of the small ones. I think she also reported that cytokine associations differ in EV's of ME/CFS patients and EV's of controls.

    Then there's this Japanese group. They seem to report a higher number of circulating EV's in ME/CFS patients compared to healthy controls but not compared to their small sample of patients with depression and idiopathic fatigue. They have also found some differences in the proteins EV's contain in ME/CFS and control groups. I don't think that they have confirmed that there are more small EV's in ME/CFS patients compared to controls. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889159119307627
     
    Last edited: Nov 22, 2019
  19. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,890
    Location:
    UK
    Does the paper specify what ME definition they use? The abstract lists depression as a key symptom, which makes no sense to me. But it might explain why they found no difference from patients with depression.
     
  20. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,814
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    This is what it says
     

Share This Page