1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Gravity-induced exercise intervention in an individual with CFS/ME and POTS, 2019, Ballantine, Srassheim, Newton

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research news' started by MeSci, Jun 11, 2019.

  1. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,822
    Location:
    Australia
  2. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,871
    Location:
    UK
    Apart from the non existent science or sense in this paper the English is pretty appalling. Try this one:
     
  3. Tilly

    Tilly Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    350
    :banghead: So let me get my head around that misquote of astronauts - holding hands or not (wonder if that is what it takes to make them better). They are active in their spaceship with no gravity and their autonomic system is out of kilter when they get back. It takes a year to get find their land legs and their autonomic system used to gravity and they want ME patients to go in anti gravity machines to get their autonomic system working again?

    In the photograph above (Figure 6) note how the astronauts are in wheelchairs. From their posture you can see that staying upright against gravity is a task in itself. Their muscle, bones, hearts and lungs have all deteriorated without the presence of gravity during their time in space.

    Perhaps the researcher should have read this? https://www.nasa.gov/centers/johnson/pdf/584739main_Wings-ch5d-pgs370-407.pdf
     
    MEMarge and Wonko like this.
  4. TiredSam

    TiredSam Committee Member

    Messages:
    10,482
    Location:
    Germany
    It has, I can now spot bullshit a mile off.
    I misread this as "... and the deliberate discomfort it has caused them".
     
  5. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    What's all this about a "period of ill health" and "the rest of your life". They really seem not to know that some die of it and many die with it. How do you study an illness without knowing this?
     
  6. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,674
    Location:
    UK
    Perhaps we should send all the proponents of anti-gravity therapy to the ISS for several months.

    If we can be bothered to pay to bring them back, then immediately upon landing they should be able to function normally.

    Lets test to see if a positive mindset, by 'experts' in it, really works, or not.

    It may cost a bit, but I'm sure all of us would chip in a fiver each if it would resolve the issue of whether or not a positive mindset and 'trying hard' can overcome one aspect of being chronically ill.

    There are, apparently, at least 17 million of us, at a fiver each, when NASA needs money to get to the moon again, not to be sniffed at.
     
  7. feeb

    feeb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    155
    Location:
    London, UK
    No, no, no, they're not saying we need anti gravity therapy. It's the other way around. The want us M.E. patients to get out of our anti gravity machines. Colloquially, we call anti gravity machines things like "beds", or "chairs", and they make our organs float weightlessly, just like astronauts, and that's very bad for us. So we need to reacquaint ourselves with gravity, using novel scientific techniques, such as "standing up" and "raising our arms".
     
  8. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    Mij, Amw66, Joh and 7 others like this.
  9. Dx Revision Watch

    Dx Revision Watch Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,324
    "At the time of writing, Julia Newton was also Dean of Clinical Medicine, Professor of Ageing and Medicine and Honorary Consultant Physician, CRESTA Fatigue Clinic..."
     
    Simone, MEMarge, Sean and 10 others like this.
  10. Sid

    Sid Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,054
    Another thing I found weird is that one of the interventions was raising arms above the head. I mean, don't many of us do this when washing hair, picking stuff off the shelf in the kitchen etc. many times a month and this does not help. I know that for me this triggers my POTS badly.
     
  11. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,145
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    Don’t forget tripe
     
  12. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,145
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    I thought the way we were is the CDC anthem now
     
    Little Bluestem and Joh like this.
  13. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,145
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    When I read the first couple of posts I thought maybe someone should email a link to this thread to this guy. On reflection not sure it would be appreciated as genuine feedback and I realise I have added to the flippancy so apologies for that
     
    Simone, MEMarge and Trish like this.
  14. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    When you have to change the meaning of words...
     
    MEMarge, adambeyoncelowe, Joh and 2 others like this.
  15. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    [​IMG]
     
  16. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    Groundbreaking stuff. Why they felt this needed an illustration is... puzzling.

    Seems almost like a joke that they would call this a "novel" intervention. The chair, such a marvel of technology and ingenuity.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2019
  17. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    26,529
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    It's so difficult, isn't it. I have received feedback that we are too harsh on researchers, and in this case, the author is clearly just starting in the field.

    But, on the other hand, this error-riddled material, the case study and the dissertation, goes out into the world to unintentionally mislead, as does the author. They will help to support harmful attitudes towards people with ME/CFS. It was the supervisors' job to guide this person to ensure that the work was safe and accurate and that the person learned how to do research. And they have not only failed but lent the unfounded conclusions credibility by adding their name to the author list.

    In the face of a relentless stream of poor research, I think satire and flippancy are reasonable responses. Maybe we can also try to engage with Julia Newton to prevent this sort of work coming out of Cresta again?
     
  18. Snowdrop

    Snowdrop Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,134
    Location:
    Canada
    I have saved the link to the paper on the internet archive.

    The paper that is the topic of this thread and has Julia Newton's name attached has been saved for posterity. For as long as the internet lives that silly piece of work will point back to her. I seriously doubt this bothers her much but I thought I'd put it out there.

    No doubt all science careers can withstand a few of these stinkers. I hope whatever paper she sign's her name to next has some kind of useful scientific merit.

    How is it that well people constantly think they know what's good for the chronically ill that the CI can't figure for themselves. I see this paper (excuse me for bluntness) as gaslighting and patronising. And definitely not science.

    Try harder.

    It's fine when a well done study reports findings that later turn out not to be substantiated. But this endless dripping of poor quality stuff of variations on the same old theme (always with positive results) has at times left me feeling quite apocalyptic about finding meaningful research in the 'try this therapy' genre.
     
    Little Bluestem, lycaena, Sid and 6 others like this.
  19. Ravn

    Ravn Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    2,044
    Location:
    Aotearoa New Zealand
    Looks like it took a while to get accepted for publication. Maybe at least one reviewer at one point had some concerns?
    The wording "had been bedbound" raises the suspicion that this patient was already naturally improving - and likely would have continued improving with or without intervention. Though it was probably lucky the exercise was only once a month or it may have reversed her improvement.
    (bolding mine)
    So what can we learn from a study showing variable results for 1+6 patients with a fluctuating illness? A few hints: zero, zilch, nada, nothing.
     
  20. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    12,299
    Location:
    Canada
    Have they considered not doing garbage research? That's usually why the criticism is so harsh, and deservedly so. Garbage research needs to be called out. This isn't kindergarten. This is real and it impacts people's lives. Quite frankly I hold on to many [expletives deleted] most of the time and much of the criticism is way too generous given the current disastrous state of affairs, where garbage research has impaired progress and caused harm to millions, fatally so in the worst cases.

    This is not an area for participation trophies. Good research gets good feedback. Bad research gets angry feedback. That's the deal. It's a fair deal and the only rational one. Most garbage research is done with complete disregard for patient experience. That's a choice, and a bad one. It needs to be called out and forever will be.
     
    Last edited: Jun 12, 2019

Share This Page