1. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 23rd November 2020 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Guest, NICE have published their draft guideline for ME/CFS, click here to read about it.
    Dismiss Notice

Effects of the prolong life with nine turn method (Yan Nian Jiu Zhuan) Qigong on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, 2018, Xie et al

Discussion in 'PsychoSocial ME/CFS Research' started by Andy, Aug 14, 2020.

  1. Andy

    Andy Committee Member & Outreach

    Messages:
    11,189
    Likes Received:
    80,846
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Full title: Effects of the prolong life with nine turn method (Yan Nian Jiu Zhuan) Qigong on patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Open access PDF available from http://apm.amegroups.com/article/view/48615
     
    chrisb, shak8 and Peter Trewhitt like this.
  2. rvallee

    rvallee Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    5,154
    Likes Received:
    40,897
    Location:
    Canada
    I have no doubt this is exactly as effective as CBT. Which is the whole problem but nevertheless it will absolutely be just as effective.

    I, for one, welcome sham treatment experiments to compare with the existing sham treatments. This is the standard that was set. Actually looking forward to a trial called SHAMWOW, these people love clever acronyms.
     
    EzzieD, Lidia, Milo and 4 others like this.
  3. Hutan

    Hutan Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    10,972
    Likes Received:
    45,851
    Last edited: Oct 4, 2020
    Trish, MEMarge, shak8 and 1 other person like this.
  4. Jonathan Edwards

    Jonathan Edwards Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    7,757
    Likes Received:
    80,258
    It is maybe of interest that if CBT were to be used in trials as the 'Standard Medical Care' control (being the current 'best practice' according to some) then we might see some rather different results.

    What would be even more interesting would be to have a circle of trials in each of which the 'active treatment' was the 'standard medical care' in the next. It would be necessary to avoid telling the people running these trials that they were involved in such a circle of course.

    So we could have trials of:

    B (active) against A (standard care)
    C (active) against B (standard care)
    D (active) against C (standard care)
    A (active) against D (standard care)

    Most likely everything would turn out better than everything else.
     
    Arnie Pye, Mij, ukxmrv and 12 others like this.

Share This Page