1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Relationship Between Exercise-induced Oxidative Stress Changes and Parasympathetic Activity in CFS - (2018) Polli et al

Discussion in 'ME/CFS research' started by Sly Saint, Jan 19, 2019.

  1. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    Relationship Between Exercise-induced Oxidative Stress Changes and Parasympathetic Activity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: An Observational Study and in Patients and Healthy Subjects

    [​IMG]Email the author MSc Andrea Polli,Jessica Van Oosterwijck, PhD,Jo Nijs, PhD,
    Uros Marusic, PhD,Inge De Wandele, PhD,Lorna Paul, PhD,Mira Meeus, PhD,Greta Moorkens, PhD
    ,Luc Lambrecht, MD,Kelly Ickmans, PhD

    https://www.clinicaltherapeutics.com/article/S0149-2918(18)30611-8/fulltext
     
    andypants, Hutan, Inara and 4 others like this.
  2. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,819
    Location:
    Australia
    HRV is generally a poor choice for the measurement of vagal activity or parasympathetic/sympathetic balance, since it is affected by both...

    However the fact that TBARS did not change after exercise is notable. Previous studies found elevated TBARS after maximal exercise...
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2019
    Hutan, andypants and Inara like this.
  3. Amw66

    Amw66 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,262
    When was the sampling done?

    Would it not have been useful to have testing done 24/48/72 hours later and compared?

    Or have i simply lost the plot? .....
     
    obeat likes this.
  4. ME/CFS Skeptic

    ME/CFS Skeptic Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,494
    Location:
    Belgium
    This is a Belgian study, so I had a quick look.

    Like their previous publication (https://www.s4me.info/threads/exerc...s-a-secondary-analysis-2018-polli-et-al.6243/) this is a secondary aalysis, an additional analysis of a subset of participants from a study that has allready been published. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28339438) They only had data for 18 ME/CFS patients in this analysis, so all results should be taken with a grain of salt.

    This research team focuses on pain. Here they wanted to study how pain in ME/CFS relates to oxidative stress (measured by the proxy Levels of thiobarbituric acid–reactive substances or TBARSs) and whether things changes after an (submaximal) exercise test.

    The authors found that pain in ME/CFS patients was indeed related to oxidative stress while this was not the case in healthy controls. But oxidative stress was not higher in ME/CFS patients than in controls and exercise had no effect on oxidative stress in either group.

    What did they did find is that in healthy people pain decreases after exercise while this was not the case in ME/CFS patients. There was no hypoalgesic effect in ME/CFS patients, a finding that has been reported previously (by this research group).

    Oxidative stress was unable to explain this, but there were some interesting results for Heart Rate Variability (HRV), a measure of parasympathetic (vagal) activity. It decreased in ME/CFS patients after exercise but not in healthy controls.

    Finally in healthy controls they found a relationship between HRV and oxidative stress. The higher the increase in parasympathetic activity during exercise, the more reduction in oxidative stress levels. So it seems that vagal activity normally exerts regulatory actions on oxidative stress during exercise, and that this was lacking in the ME/CFS group.
     
    Hutan, Mij, Liessa and 8 others like this.
  5. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,819
    Location:
    Australia
    The problem is that vagal activity cannot be directly inferred from HRV or HRV-High Frequency band, as both sympathetic and parasympathetic activity have an effect on the HF component.

    Differences between patients and controls could simply be due to poor matching between patients and controls. Self-reported "sedentary" lifestyle of a healthy person doesn't necessarily mean they are matched.

    There is much debate about this and simply avoiding reporting the commonly used LF/
    HF ratio doesn't solve the problem.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12154170
    https://www.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpheart.2001.280.6.H2804

    It's like measuring cortisol - just because it's easy, doesn't mean it's a good idea to rely on it in these sorts of studies.

    Oh, and during exercise, parameters such as breathing/respiratory rate, heart rate and HRV changes tend to lag, rather than lead performance/effort perception, thus any increased sympathetic activity or altered parasympathetic activity is likely a response to the physiological challenge, rather than a cause of any difference in performance.
     
    Last edited: Jan 20, 2019
    Hutan, Mij, Inara and 5 others like this.

Share This Page