1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 15th April 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

Cases of Acute Flaccid Myelitis in Minnesota and other states

Discussion in 'Other health news and research' started by Webdog, Oct 7, 2018.

  1. Pyrrhus

    Pyrrhus Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    37
    Location:
    U.S., Earth
    For an insight into the CDC’s thinking, consider this 2014 article from the Lancet:

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(14)70132-2/fulltext

    “Maybe we should know more about it”

    Does Mark Pallansch know that poliovirus does not show up in the CSF, except in the most severe 1% of cases? This is why, in the 1950’s, polio was diagnosed purely based on visible signs and symptoms. It was well appreciated at the time that poliovirus simply does not show up in either the blood or CSF after the first symptoms have become apparent.
     
    Inara, Lisa108, rvallee and 4 others like this.
  2. Pyrrhus

    Pyrrhus Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    37
    Location:
    U.S., Earth
    Update from the CDC:
    https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6812a1.htm?s_cid=mm6812a1_w

    Good to hear the CDC is trying active, prospective, surveillance.
    Active, prospective, surveillance is the only real surveillance.

    CDC’s passive surveillance approach is extremely limited in its capacity to identify infectious outbreaks.
    I wonder how many outbreaks have been missed over the years due to the CDC’s “sit back and wait for someone to say something” approach.

    ...And when did they switch from calling it “Acute Flaccid Paralysis (AFP)” to calling it “Acute Flaccid Myelitis (AFM)”?
     
    ladycatlover, andypants and Webdog like this.
  3. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Australia
    A bit of Google Scholar sleuthing suggests it was the CDC who started using the term AFM in 2014.
     
  4. Pyrrhus

    Pyrrhus Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    37
    Location:
    U.S., Earth
    And now NIAID has weighed in, with a somewhat more urgent outlook than the CDC’s:
    https://mbio.asm.org/content/10/2/e00521-19

    Ten years ago people warned that Enterovirus 71 would be the “poliovirus of the 21st century”:
    https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10158782.2009.11441350
    https://dabamirror.sci-hub.tw/4635/2ca3893261125263cb72e32d848d0c11/modlin2007.pdf

    Now they’re saying Enterovirus D68 might claim that title:
    https://twin.sci-hub.tw/6383/99012e8beec3c1fc6b4125ac3aa4f916/wiznitzer2017.pdf
    (co-authored by Avi Nath, of the NIH Post-infectious ME study)
     
  5. Forbin

    Forbin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    1,581
    Location:
    USA
    According to this story, Enterovirus-D68 has been confirmed in one patient, but...
    http://www.startribune.com/virus-identified-as-a-cause-of-paralyzing-condition-in-minnesota-children-acute-flaccid-myelitis/508757812/
     
    andypants and ScottTriGuy like this.
  6. Pyrrhus

    Pyrrhus Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    37
    Location:
    U.S., Earth
    The CDC has now conceded that Enterovirus D68 can cause Acute Flaccid Paralysis. Although the concession of causality is within the context of a single patient, there may be wider implications.

    https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/68/wr/mm6815a4.htm?s_cid=mm6815a4_w
     
    Hutan, Snow Leopard and Amw66 like this.
  7. Snow Leopard

    Snow Leopard Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    3,827
    Location:
    Australia
    It has been discussed in the literature for quite a while, so I'm not totally surprised.
     

Share This Page