1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sunday Express: 'New laws could see scientists face CRIMINAL charges for research fraud'

Discussion in 'Health News and Research unrelated to ME/CFS' started by Sasha, Dec 3, 2017.

  1. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    4,762
    Location:
    UK
    Finally! I've never understood why people putting out misleading medical research shouldn't go to jail.



    Click through, give them the traffic, read the rest, comment: https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/8...nal-charges-fraudulent-medical-drugs-research
     
    Yessica, Inara, Indigophoton and 27 others like this.
  2. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    241
    Likes Received:
    1,920
    What a surprise that, with all the talk of death threats, this story is not being seriously pursued by the SMC. Sounds right up their street.
     
    Atle, ladycatlover, Barry and 12 others like this.
  3. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    638
    Likes Received:
    3,511
    Location:
    UK
    Hopefully this will eventually lead to some prosecutions.
     
  4. TiredSam

    TiredSam Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,047
    Likes Received:
    6,561
    Hopefully it won't just be confined to pharmaceuticals.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
  5. arewenearlythereyet

    arewenearlythereyet Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    638
    Likes Received:
    3,511
    Location:
    UK
    Hopefully the guideline or whatever can be written into all university ethical standards of conduct and disciplinary procedures for all academic staff. Probably will need some sort of oversight to enforce...can't have these professors regulating themselves.
     
  6. Allele

    Allele Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    245
    Likes Received:
    1,905
    We need courageous insiders to speak up en masse so we can watch the dominos fall, Weinstein-style.
    (somehow typing this gave me the unwelcome mental image of Harvey doing the Gangnam dance :nailbiting::bag: )
     
    Inara, ladycatlover, Binkie4 and 8 others like this.
  7. Trish

    Trish Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    864
    Likes Received:
    6,829
    Location:
    UK
    Unfortunately I suspect this won't apply to the BPS crowd. They do badly designed research and draw unjustified conclusions from it, but as far as I know they don't invent the data or get their sums wrong. They even say blatantly that they have moved the goal posts (recovery criteria), so can't be accused of hiding this.
     
    Mij, Inara, ladycatlover and 6 others like this.
  8. Sasha

    Sasha Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    759
    Likes Received:
    4,762
    Location:
    UK
    I agree it's unlikely to immediately apply but I think it's a step in the right direction.
     
  9. large donner

    large donner Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    622
    Less drugs and more CBT?
     
    Inara, ladycatlover, Esther12 and 2 others like this.
  10. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    4,055
    That's what I was thinking.
     
    Inara, ladycatlover, Trish and 4 others like this.
  11. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    788
    Likes Received:
    4,055
    That's what I was fearing.
     
  12. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    This is a good idea, but the execution is the thing, done badly it could be worse then our present situation and thats terrifying
     
    Inara, ladycatlover and Trish like this.
  13. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    4,649
    Location:
    UK
    I'm all in favour of badly done execution, when called for, just as long as it's ultimately effective.:devilish:
     
  14. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    You realize this could mean people doing real science could be jailed for going against the "established" narrative. Sending Fluge/Mella and Dr Davis to jail because Ester was making claims years before they got involved in ME/CFS research for example would be insane. The law can be used for evil.
     
    Inara likes this.
  15. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    697
    Likes Received:
    4,649
    Location:
    UK
    It frequently is, and always has been, people generally misunderstand the purpose of the law.

    People have always been penalised, sometimes with loss of reputation, sometimes with loss of liberty, sometimes with loss of livelihood and sometimes with loss of life, for going against authority and their "views". Whilst here, in more recent times, things have not been so harsh, haven't needed to be when people can be silenced by simply cutting their funding, things may be changing again.

    It's not good, I don't agree with it, it's just the way things operate, for those without sufficient power or influence.

    This is the world, this is what people do.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2017
    EzzieD and Trish like this.
  16. Alvin

    Alvin Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    354
    Likes Received:
    1,731
    And thats my point, making bad laws that liars and reality deniers can use against legitimate scientists is counter productive. You can't improve things by making them worse
     
    Inara and Wonko like this.
  17. Adrian

    Adrian Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    773
    Likes Received:
    4,072
    Location:
    UK
    Also a lot of the rules apply to drug trials only so trials of other interventions such as CBT are not as heavily regulated.
     
    Inara, Allele, Trish and 2 others like this.
  18. EzzieD

    EzzieD Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    47
    Likes Received:
    557
    Location:
    UK
    And if forcing ever-increasing exercise onto patients who have exertion intolerance as their main defining symptom isn't regulated (which I'm guessing isn't regulated at all, never mind heavily), it jolly well should be!
     
  19. Valentijn

    Valentijn Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    1,521
    Likes Received:
    7,157
    Location:
    Netherlands
    Ahh, but exercise intolerance doesn't exist in psychiatry, ergo it must not exist at all :rolleyes::
    Obviously there are many doctors and other practitioners (at least in the ME/CFS sphere) who aren't aware of mitochondrial or other muscular diseases where increases in activity, especially at the wrong time, can do a great deal of damage. A couple examples are muscle fibers being destroyed and causing kidney failure, or generating excessive lactic acid which accumulates in the CNS and causes seizures and brain damage. And then there's even more obvious problems, such as exercising with diabetes when ketones are elevated due to high blood sugar, or exercising when blood pressure is badly elevated, or even exercising when you have the damned flu :grumpy:

    There's really no excuse for quacks to be claiming that even mild exercise is always beneficial.
     
  20. strategist

    strategist Established Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    73
    Likes Received:
    809
    Yay, hurray! Good news. This was overdue. Now please come up with a clear definition of research fraud that includes things like the PACE trial. There must be at least the realistic possibility of serious consequences for researchers that promote their brand of therapy by falsely describing severely disabled people as having gotten "back to normal".
     
    Last edited: Dec 4, 2017
    Little Bluestem, Viola, Alvin and 5 others like this.

Share This Page