1. Sign our petition calling on Cochrane to withdraw their review of Exercise Therapy for CFS here.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Guest, the 'News in Brief' for the week beginning 18th March 2024 is here.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. Welcome! To read the Core Purpose and Values of our forum, click here.
    Dismiss Notice

UK: Disability benefits (ESA and PIP) - news and updates up to end of 2020

Discussion in 'Work, Finances and Disability Insurance' started by Andy, Nov 6, 2017.

  1. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,871
    Location:
    UK
    I seem to have mislaid my pitchfork. :sob:
     
    ladycatlover, Webdog, MEMarge and 9 others like this.
  2. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,674
    Location:
    UK
    Possession of fire or a pitchfork with 2 miles of the houses of Parliament is probably punishable by indefinite imprisonment without charge and thrice hourly beatings by people in black uniforms with no numbers on - as is filming such people.
     
    ladycatlover, Squeezy, Barry and 6 others like this.
  3. Andy

    Andy Committee Member

    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Hampshire, UK
    Here you go... ;)

    -------€
    or
    -------£
     
    ladycatlover, MEMarge, Lidia and 6 others like this.
  4. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    Whatever happened to Damian Greens promise of excluding people with chronic illnesses............that he then clarified would be done on an individual case by case basis.......ie what they were doing in the first place and continue to doo_O
     
  5. large donner

    large donner Guest

    Messages:
    1,214
    I think charging the DWP for each no brainer case it loses is not such a good idea as it will cost money to the public purse.

    Perhaps the individuals involved should be identified and have their incomes sanctioned to below the minimum income required to live on and should also be requested to attend regular appointments with income coaches who tell them to work more hours to make up for the losses they have incurred.

    However one small difference is that any dependent children they have should not be punished by cutting the offenders income, even I am not mean enough to wish this punishment on someones children unlike the government of this country who happily push starving families to food banks and homelessness in the name of helping hard working families.
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
    ladycatlover, MEMarge, Lidia and 4 others like this.
  6. Wonko

    Wonko Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    6,674
    Location:
    UK
    As all the "mistakes" seem to be made by people above 3 feet tall surely any rational person would agree that the DWP should immediately introduce a policy to ensure all of it's staff are no longer above 3 feet tall - I believe this single measure would drastically cut the "mistakes" down to a more manageable size.

    If it works in chocolate factories.......
     
    Last edited: Nov 12, 2017
  7. Joel

    Joel Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    941
    Location:
    UK
    I won a PIP appeal myself this year. The DWP's case was complete rubbish and overturned almost every bit they looked at. Basically, as the citizens advice person says they completely disregard all evidence from other medical practitioners, even if they are much more senior than the assessor, and they give no reasons for doing so. It was a complete joke, but caused me financial difficulties and a load of stress that made me more ill. As bad as my case was I think it was typical of everyday cases the tribunal sees.
     
  8. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    That is the logical conclusion, however the whole process was supposed to reduce costs and has ended up costing more than if they'd left it alone.

    All that would happen is they would somehow figure out other ways of making it harder to claim or
    other ways of reducing the benefits still further.

    (They've already introduced means testing by the back door on ESA (ie you only get 1 years worth if you are put into the Work Related Activity group) and then it is means tested.
    I think it is only a matter of time before all disability benefits are means tested.)
     
  9. Diluted-biscuit

    Diluted-biscuit Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    518
    Sounds like a good idea, hit them where it hurts, the wallet!
     
    ladycatlover, Squeezy and Jan like this.
  10. It's M.E. Linda

    It's M.E. Linda Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    917
    Just remembered to go and have a look and can't find my entry - that's "a bit annoying" when it took a lot of my effort.
    Nothing to do now but I will put it on my 'to do' list for this week, to contact the clerks for W&P committee and check out what happens to the responses that haven't got through moderation (didn't put anything contentious in......)
     
  11. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    Quite so. The standard slippery bar-stewards' strategy of creating intermediaries so the buck can always be passed down the line.

    What these people never seem to realise about plausible deniability, is that the denials cease to be plausible once the behaviour becomes an established pattern.
     
  12. Barry

    Barry Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    8,385
    In principle I agree, but the problem in this case is that it would ultimately be the taxpayers' wallet.
     
    ladycatlover, Valentijn and Wonko like this.
  13. Diluted-biscuit

    Diluted-biscuit Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    518
    I disagree. The point of fines like this is to make them think twice about making pointless stupid rejections in the first place. Its the fear of having to pay that encourage changes that cut down the number of appeals, which aren’t cheap in themselves and of course paid for by the taxpayer. It should have minimal effect on public finances but a huge effect on the people not having to appeal their case for no reason.
     
    Jan, Skycloud, ladycatlover and 5 others like this.
  14. NelliePledge

    NelliePledge Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    13,142
    Location:
    UK West Midlands
    The whole set up is flawed isn't it. It is never going to be an easy thing to get right and no doubt if left to GP advice there would still be a lot of issues especially for ME patients and a total lottery where you could get people treated properly, or GPs being too strict or too lax.
    I don't understand why DWP are taking so many to tribunal. They should be reviewing their decision making guidance based on the case law. Or if the rules aren't meeting the policy objectives they have to tighten them through changes to primary or secondary legislation. the fact is it was always going to be practically difficult to tighten access to disability benefits but this was,at the time, seen as a less scary challenge politically than subjecting retirement pensions to austerity limits. Which would have been a very simple way administratively of making savings on welfare.
     
    Graham, Jan, Skycloud and 3 others like this.
  15. Trish

    Trish Moderator Staff Member

    Messages:
    51,871
    Location:
    UK
    I think the organisation that needs to be hit in the pocket is the private company that has been given the contract to do the medicals. In my area it is ATOS which is, I understand, one of the huge multinational companies that take on practically anything, then employ and train the people to do the task, cutting corners and bending rules whenever possible in order to make maximum profit.

    I gather that in many cases the problem is the people they employ to do the medicals - nurses or physios mainly I think, are not knowledgeable about most of the disabilities they are assessing. For example, a physio is unlikely to understand the level of disability caused by mental illness. The reports they produce are not a true reflection of the patient's situation and what they can and can't do.

    I think in any case that goes to appeal where the report is found to be wrong or inadequate, the company, ATOS, should have a heavy fine reflecting the full cost of the appeal and a compensation payment to the patient (I wish).

    I suspect as a result the company would pull out of the contract, as they do when the profits drop away, leaving the government forced to directly employ and train the medical assessors, or redesign the whole system.
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
    Graham, Jan, Skycloud and 10 others like this.
  16. Valentijn

    Valentijn Guest

    Messages:
    2,275
    Location:
    Netherlands
    But the government won't do that, since ATOS is doing the job which the government paid them to do. If they are not violating their contract with the government, then they probably can't be punished for what's happening.

    Pulling out of a contract is almost always a violation of that contract, and likely to have some nasty expenses involved. And there will always be another profit-driven company ready to step in and squeeze the government for every penny that it's willing to pay.

    The government created this mess, and they're the only ones in a position to fix it. They don't want to, so the voters have to force them to do it or replace them with politicians who will.
     
    Jan, Skycloud, ladycatlover and 3 others like this.
  17. Sly Saint

    Sly Saint Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    9,574
    Location:
    UK
    ATOS did pull out of ESA (because all the bad press was affecting their share price amongst other things).............then the DWP hired Maximus............but then they got ATOS back to do PIP assessments(?) they must have come up with some changes/financial incentives(?)

    Maximus tried where possible not to use their name (to try and protect the brand) but it hasn't worked and are going the same way:
    "
    Maximus miss fitness-to-work test targets despite spiralling costs
    Company took over contract from Atos in March to carry out medical assessments of claimants for ESA. The bill for ESA and PIP assessments has now reached £579m" (from2016)

    "
    Maximus ‘admits’ using brutal and dangerous suicide questions"

    https://www.disabledgo.com/blog/201...and-dangerous-suicide-questions/#.Wglcm7iLDCM

    But then there is the introduction of Universal Credit which (at the moment) is replacing 6 benefits and includes Income-related ESA.

    https://www.turn2us.org.uk/Benefit-.../Which-benefits-will-Universal-Credit-replace
     
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
    Jan, ladycatlover, Barry and 5 others like this.
  18. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    If only we were privy to the departmental discussions and advice that Peter Lilley received prior to hiring John Locascio, and the advice which he subsequently gave.
     
    NelliePledge, Esther12 and Wonko like this.
  19. Esther12

    Esther12 Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,393
    I wonder if so much time has now passed that copies of things like that might start becoming more accessible under the FOIA? I can't believe that this has been going on for so long!
     
  20. chrisb

    chrisb Senior Member (Voting Rights)

    Messages:
    4,602
    That is rather what I was wondering, but I am not in a position to do anything about it.
     
    Esther12 likes this.

Share This Page